|
The Pitch
Nov 18, 2018 1:02:32 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by misdemeanor on Nov 18, 2018 1:02:32 GMT 1
Our pitch has come for some fierce criticism recently and even the last two refs have reported it to the SFA.
I have to admit I think its woeful having seen Raiths Rovers recently and the difference for the same type of surface is night and day. If you buy a new car for example and something goes wrong tben you have it fixed under warranty. I would go back to our installers and ask them to either rip it up and start again or fix the problem.
Im not in anyway complaining about the team or performance we have adapted well to it but FFS it is the worst playing surface artificial in Scotland.
Comments PLEASE no doubt you will all disagree...
|
|
|
Post by orco on Nov 18, 2018 5:14:11 GMT 1
Apart from seeing pellets rise now and then what exactly is it that you feel is wrong with it? Personally I like the pellets. So distinctive. đ
|
|
|
The Pitch
Nov 18, 2018 8:02:35 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by misdemeanor on Nov 18, 2018 8:02:35 GMT 1
It plays slow and its in balanced its awful its just not right IMO
|
|
|
Post by orco on Nov 18, 2018 9:48:35 GMT 1
Can't say my imperfect eye has noticed either.
|
|
|
Post by colcal on Nov 18, 2018 10:35:06 GMT 1
More subjective nonsense, not predicated on any facts. Itâs an easy target and opposition players - such as those in the OF - had criticised it before theyâd even played on it.
For Kieran Teirneyâs hamstring âniggleâ to be blamed on the pitch, when it evidently didnât affect MacGregor, Christie or Forrest, is surely an embarrassing statement for the media to report.
Correlation does not mean causation. Iâd love someone to produce findings that support their position - that the artificial pitches are poor to play on and cause more injuries than grass ones. I assume that if facts were available, the authorities would not allow such pitches to be used in the top flight. When a player gets injured on the artificial pitches, it was the fault of the pitch. When countless players suffer the same injuries on grass pitches, itâs just one of those things that happens to footballers.
Perhaps we should ask for grass pitches to be banned because Ryan Hardie suffered a horrible injury at Tannadice at the end of last season.
We are about to find out how irregular and inconsistent grass pitches are - heavy, barren and rutted during winter. Some will drain well, others wonât. Some will remain even, others will be like ploughed fields. The suggestion that grass pitches are consistent ihas no basis in fact. Liviâs home advantage, if one exists, is no different to the advantage that any other home team can have. Hearts like to keep their grass longer sometimes. Quite right too. Rangers and Celtic like their grass pitches to be cut short, as wide as possible and well watered to suit their play. How dare Livi have a slow pitch against The OF?!
For once, Livi is a club playing within its means. An atirifical surface generates new income. It encourages community support. It allows the players to train at their home pitch every day without having to hire an alternative venue. It makes absolutely perfect economic and footballing sense. Those ready to crirticise that decision have yet to offer an alternative way for smaller clubs like ours to survive. We canât afford to spend ÂŁ2.4m on lights to entertain 60,000 fans before kick-off. So, cutting our cloth is eminently sensible.
Finally, once teams come to the TMA and start to win, perhaps the pitch will receive less attention.
|
|
Pedro
Administrator
Posts: 1,172
|
Post by Pedro on Nov 18, 2018 13:20:28 GMT 1
For once, Livi is a club playing within its means. An Artifical surface generates new income. It encourages community support. Our entire history as Livingston FC should tell anyone who thinks that we're playing/living within our means to tread cautiously in those beliefs. Since the astroturf pitch was installed does anyone know how many times has it been used by folk out with the club and how much 'extra' income has been brought in?
|
|
|
Post by jonsnow on Nov 18, 2018 15:45:47 GMT 1
Yeah the pitch is getting a lot of criticism, mostly from folk that haven't even played on it, or seen it. Favourite one I've seen is "apparently Livi's is the worst one". The "apparently" part instantly gives their statement no credibility.
Killie's pitch always got it tight too, more so in recent seasons, when they started winning on it, not so much when they were rotten and lost to teams, funny that isn't it?
The mistake we made was not paying a bit extra for green pellets, the black ones made it more noticeable, plus in the bedding in stage we were a bit heavy with the pellets. Looks a lot better now since we thinned them down a bit and the pitch has settled in with us playing a few games on it.
McLeish's comments were ridiculous, and quite frankly out of order, good to see Gary Holt saying as much in a response to him, totally agree with Holt too, it's just being used for an excuse for teams dropping points to us, or folk with ill informed opinions rolling out the astro turf clichés.
|
|
|
Post by Auldnick on Nov 18, 2018 21:31:05 GMT 1
I donât like artificial pitches, never have & I dare say I never will; but our team seem to play reasonably well on fake grass so if it gives us an advantage, great.
I donât think green pellets would have made any difference to anyoneâs perception, good or bad. The black pellets look like dirt until they get plastered over Byrneâ s face.
Despite what I have said above I have noticed (on more than one occasion) the ball getting getting stuck briefly as players try to control it, Iâve seen the ball slow up drastically when passed over distance on the surface.& the bounce can catch players out - on the plus side of that, our guys are starting to get used to it, so it can again give us an advantage.
On the issue of it producing extra revenue (Pedroâs question) - I donât think anyone ever suggested it would be used for other activities during the season, at least not immediately. Letâs see what happens in the summer - I would love to see it hosting a small stadium rock concert... Livi marketing department should get in touch with bands like Within Temptation & Alter Bridge... mind you the close proximity of the new housing down there could prohibit that sort of event due to noise levels.
|
|
|
Post by jonsnow on Nov 19, 2018 0:06:49 GMT 1
I disagree with you Auldnick, Accies got the green pellets and you can hardly see them kicking up, our black pellets drew the eye to them and the Sportscene guys never stopped talking about them spraying up.
On kicks and bounces, ball sticking etc, grass pitches do that too, you just get used to it and home advantage applies on grass too, so on that score I see no difference. I noticed the semi final at Murrayfield had the ball sticking on the pitch.
*Edited to add, our grass pitch was hardly ideal the last few seasons anyway, i'd say the astro pitch we have this season is better than what we've had for about three or four seasons.
|
|
|
Post by Auldnick on Nov 19, 2018 0:30:45 GMT 1
Havenât seen enough games on Accies pitch to notice but having just seen some on the NFL game on the telly just now, you might be right, they seem to blend in with the grass & are less noticeable... however the sheer volume in our early games might have negated that point but weâll never know now.
The type of sticking I am talking about only happens on non-grass pitches, itâs as if the surface has bunched up like a loose carpet or rug. So that the ball almost âdigs inâ or âjamsâ between foot & surface, Iâve never seen the same effect on grass.
I do agree with you that grass pitches have their own issues & for me the bottom line is that pros should be capable of playing on any surface. I prefer grass but I donât think the fake grass has anywhere near as many âdownsidesâ as are being suggested by pillocks like Keith Jackson & Alex McLeish... I notice that while Tierney has picked up an injury, our pitch didnât prevent Christie, McGregor or Forrest from playing arguably their best games for Scotland & Lustig managed to play for Sweden without any issues.
|
|
|
The Pitch
Nov 21, 2018 23:03:06 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by colcal on Nov 21, 2018 23:03:06 GMT 1
Given the recent excellent performances for Scotland by Celtic trio Forrest, MacGregor and Christie so soon after their visit to the TMA, perhaps the whole Scotland team should train on an artificial pitch before matches in future.........rather than blaming the surface on phantom injuries.
Better still, bring in some Livi players to shore up the national teamâs defence.
|
|
|
Post by Auldnick on Nov 22, 2018 7:49:59 GMT 1
No chance of that, McLeish is a back 4 man
|
|
|
The Pitch
Nov 25, 2018 0:54:11 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by misdemeanor on Nov 25, 2018 0:54:11 GMT 1
But the point is being missed.
English premier pitches are perfect throughout the year as is English championship that is due to two simple elements ground staff and heat lamps. Simple science when you imitate the sun the grass grows.
It does not cost the earth for either.
Anyway im sure we will reep the benefits of renting out the pitch for ÂŁ150 an hour should have payback back in no time!!!
|
|
|
Post by Auldnick on Nov 25, 2018 2:29:32 GMT 1
English premiership clubs are mega rich from their highly lucrative TV deals & can afford top quality drainage systems. Comparing the two leagues is chalk & cheese.
|
|
|
The Pitch
Nov 25, 2018 3:09:40 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by misdemeanor on Nov 25, 2018 3:09:40 GMT 1
Yes again assumed I was comparing apples with sand, where quite opposite.
The gap is indeed tremendous but the PRINCIPLE remains the same its not fortunes to rent / hire appropriate equipment in this day and age to do as nature does. The payback of artificial vs grass interesting to find out out season costs to keep ypur pitch green.
|
|
|
Post by Auldnick on Nov 25, 2018 10:21:54 GMT 1
Not having priced it I canât argue but based on what it used to cost to keep the undersoil heating going... the principle may be the same but when a club is on a shoestring budget as ours is then itâs not the principle of the thing that matters is it?
|
|